|
Speech by the President of
Ecuador, Rafael Correa, at the
Meeting of the Andean Council of
Presidents
Guayaquil, October 14, 2008
At the Tarija Summit, where we
set out to “develop and deepen
the Andean Community’s
integration process, taking into
account the visions and
approaches of the Member
Countries,” we expressed an
unswerving political will to
continue our integration on the
basis of mutual respect, despite
the unprecedented challenge of
having to strive for the same
goal through different economic
visions and approaches.
At this historic moment in time,
when the system that has
prevailed over the past two
decades is seen to be no longer
viable, we must give serious
thought to the benefits of
uniting our political wills and
of regional trade, cultural
integration, development
planning, and so forth.
We are one hundred million
men and women, a huge community
that should work in peace, in
democracy, and united within our
diversity.
We Member Countries, with the
support of the General
Secretariat, have done our
utmost to deepen our trade
integration, advance in our
negotiation of an Association
Agreement with the European
Union, and strengthen
cooperation in the other areas
of the process, with important
results.
Even so, we find ourselves today
at a new crossroads. Certain
areas in which the diversity of
visions and approaches of the
Member Countries have been
manifested have apparently
become obstacles to the
successful continuation of our
joint negotiations with the
European Union.
This situation is threatening
not only to bring to a
standstill accomplishments that
have cost all of us large
amounts of resources and a great
deal of sacrifice over decades,
but, worse still, jeopardizes
the very existence of the
integration process and the
possibility of continuing to
remain united.
We must be frank about this
matter: the integration process
is not at its best right now.
Of the four Member Countries,
two have broken off diplomatic
relations with each other. In
addition, two countries have
already completed free trade
agreements with the United
States in legitimate exercise of
their sovereignty, while the
other two are opposed to this
free trade vision of world
trade. Two countries have
already asked the EU to consider
allowing them to pursue their
negotiations on a bilateral
basis and the response from the
EU, at least for the Pro Tempore
Chair, is worrying, to say the
least. These are facts, not
conjectures. The questions to
be answered, then, both at the
level of this process with the
EU and regarding the future of
the CAN, are: Can we continue
to remain united? Should we
continue to remain united? And
I believe the answer is a
resounding YES, for this depends
basically not on technical
matters or political visions,
but on our will to pursue our
integration.
The Special Summit Meeting that
brings us together today offers
a historic opportunity to find
lasting solutions so that the
integration process may resume
its dynamic growth, but on new
bases that emphasize those
things that unite us, that which
we can do better together,
than separately.
We seek our nations’
comprehensive welfare through
different development models and
visions, adopted with
sovereignty, but we can rapidly
identify, taking a pragmatic and
flexible approach, a series of
common interests in strategic
areas that promote and improve
capacities and opportunities for
integral development.
In order to define actions that
will permit the accomplishment
of these common interests, we
must accept the following
premises as a sine qua non:
first, the creation and
preservation of spaces for
formulating and implementing
national policies; and second,
the full exercise, by Community
bodies, of their functions and
jurisdictional capacities within
the framework of the strategic
areas identified.
As a concrete corollary to the
foregoing, it is essential to
make commitments assumed in
areas of trade integration where
differences exist more flexible,
as well as to deepen spheres
that facilitate trade in areas
where important advances are
being made.
Action in the short term
In recent months, our
representatives, particularly in
the Andean Commission, have
found it impossible to agree on
a common tariff policy, on
liberalizing financial services
at the Subregional level and on
intellectual property. In the
latter case, the latest vote
taken with regard to the
amendment of Decision 486
revealed the extent of our
differences and the difficulty
of continuing to address these
matters in the usual way.
As Ecuador stated on assuming
the CAN’s Pro Tempore
Chairmanship, it is essential
for us to focus our efforts on
recovering the Andean Community
as an “area of coexistence
for development” versatile
enough to reflect the varying
interests of the Member
Countries, while at the same
time giving priority to action
that the CAN’s present
institutions and the political
and economic conditions of its
Members can make effectively
viable.
With this aim in mind, this
Council should issue an
instruction --to be put into
practice later through the
approval of a Commission
Decision-- for the conduct of an
appropriate study, free from the
pressures of the present
situation, to strengthen Andean
integration in the cited areas
--in other words, tariff policy,
financial services and property
rights, basically intellectual
property rights.
Another Presidential instruction
is needed to outline the
relationship between the Andean
countries and other countries,
particularly the European Union,
with which the Community
negotiation of an Association
Agreement is at a standstill,
its resumption being
imperative.
Ecuador, as Chairman Pro
Tempore, has done its utmost to
keep this process a
“bloc-to-bloc” negotiation,
despite the stipulations of
Decision 598.
It is essential, if this
initiative is to have any
possibility of success, for us
to commit ourselves to respect
the different positions of each
of our governments and to not
oppose the measures demanded of
them by their development
models, as already agreed in
Decision 667.
No country can be allowed to
have a veto right. Instead,
Member Countries must cooperate
with each other in order to
ensure the coordination, in
these negotiations, that is
needed to safeguard Andean
jurisprudence, understood in its
broadest sense of maintaining
the balances that have been
reached among our countries.
Nor can there be a
preestablished trade agreement
model, as the EU President
implies in the letter mentioned
earlier.
In the medium term
It is necessary to discuss the
implementation and continuation
of possible integration
projects, in order to spur the
advance of our integration
process. I would accordingly
like to propose the Working Plan
for October 2008 – June 2009
that has been placed in your
respective folders and that
contains several actions in the
social, environmental, economic,
trade and foreign relations
areas.
In the long term
A vision that respects the
cultural diversity of the
peoples, but that, at the same
time, identifies a community
with shared values and
interests, must be constructed
through concrete efforts in the
political, economic, social and
environmental spheres. This
will make it possible to
strengthen an Andean
consciousness or identity,
grounded in the adoption of the
principle of non-discrimination
by reason of nationality.
Community actions cover from the
consolidation of the people’s
freedom of movement and their
right to establishment and
residence, to the formulation of
Subregional social, economic,
environmental and cultural
policies and strategies for
promoting more equal
opportunity, boosting the
productivity of our citizens and
enterprises, conserving our
shared natural heritage and
shaping a common cultural space,
through the establishment of
Andean Consulates and the
creation of an Andean
institutional structure for
conserving our biodiversity.
In this vision, integration
should be seen as a tool for
governance and sustainable
development at the service
of the shared interests of the
Member Countries and their
citizens, and requires the
construction of Andean
citizenry as the focal point
for coordinating everything that
unites us.
Build Andean citizenry by
creating a space for the
exercise of new rights,
freedoms or guarantees
additional to those
recognized by the States, with
the recognition and protection
of Human Rights in Community
action as the starting point;
that consolidates freedom of
movement of individuals through
the creation of the Andean
Labor Migration Card; and
that strengthens coordination
for the supervision of external
borders and judicial and police
cooperation based on a common
vision of security.
Conservation of a shared
cultural heritage through
strategies for the management of
ecosystems such as: high
plateaus, high Andean forests
and the Andean Amazon; the
establishment of an
institutional structure for
conserving the biodiversity, and
strategies and policies for the
integrated management of water
resources and shared
hydrographic basins.
An equitable, supportive and
complementary alternative
economic space that will
consolidate the subregional
market for goods by harmonizing
customs legislation and
cooperation; boost agricultural
production in order to attain
food sovereignty; promote
industrial and handicraft
production with an added value;
foster responsible and
sustainable Andean tourism, and
achieve mutual recognition of
professional degrees.
A socially and culturally
inclusive Community that will
supplement national strategies
and policies for fighting
poverty and promoting social
equity; that will contribute to
the promotion of equal
opportunity; that will foster a
common approach to education
that will revalue our history;
that will boost access to
medicine and the epidemiological
surveillance of diseases that
move across national borders;
and that will make it possible
to create a common cultural
space in which diversity,
intercultural dialogue, and
access to and mobility of
cultural goods and services are
promoted.
This is the challenge we have
ahead of us and reason for a
third Presidential instruction,
entrusting the Group of
Plenipotentiary Representatives
for the Reform of the CAN
with preparing a design for
integration that will, through
concrete measures, make the
“unity in diversity” we have
been proclaiming a reality.
Integration requires a
deliberate planning
effort (notably absent from
neoliberal regimes), preceded by
reflection and incorporating
contributions from academe and
civil society regarding the
direction and future projection
to be given to the Andean
integration project.
For the first time in the CAN’s
history, one of its fundamental
bodies has met: the
Consultative Council of the
Indigenous Peoples.
In other words, and although it
may sound paradoxical: at
last, the Andean peoples have
been integrated into the Andean
Community.
And at the level of consultative
committees, the Afro-Latin
American peoples have also been
integrated into its work.
These proposals are the result
of the intensive and extensive
efforts of consultative
committees, made up of
entrepreneurs, workers, farmers,
and universities, etc.
For that reason, the
plenipotentiary representatives
appointed by the Governments of
the Member Countries should hold
meetings periodically in order
to be able to present an
appropriate analysis of the
Andean integration process to
the next Meeting of the Andean
Council of Presidents for
approval.
One of the greatest challenges
to the integration process is
quite possibly that of building
a feeling of belonging to
our Community, so that Community
efforts can be backed by the
acceptance of the citizens,
thereby giving them legitimacy.
The concept of Andean citizenry
could be the new focal point for
coordinating the integration
process
and would be grounded in the
recognition of democratic and
intercultural values, respect
for human rights,
non-discrimination by reason of
nationality, and a series of
political, social,
environmental, cultural and
economic freedoms and rights the
citizens of Andean
Community Member Countries could
exercise within an integrated
territory.
I have the pleasure of giving
all of you a brief outline of
what could be an “Andean
Community for its Citizens,”
consisting of the bare elements
needed for meeting the challenge
of having the Andean integration
process permit its citizens to
be firmly committed to the
construction of a great vigorous
and supportive integrated Nation
so that we might, in harmony
with nature, confront the
challenges posed by
globalization and move forward
with an identity and strengths
of our own.
Integration will be the result
not so much of complex technical
formulas or long studies and
deliberations, as of our
POLITICAL WILL, our sovereign
decision, dictated by the
imperative of a common history,
of common roots that uphold the
brilliant possibility of a
common future of wellbeing and
strength.
The time has come to summon
Chile as a full Member, to its
natural space, to this, its
home, “from which it should
never have withdrawn,” as our
fellow President, Michelle
Bachelet, stated so
perceptively.
Panama and Mexico should also be
welcomed as observers and
supportive Members; we are
closely linked to all of the
nations south of the Río
Grande.
Esteemed colleagues:
The current crisis of the
so-called First World shows us
once again that we must move
ahead on our own two feet and
rely basically on our own
strengths. In order to do this,
the integration of our peoples
and nations is an inescapable
requirement. The CAN is, in the
immediate and long term
perspective, a natural member of
UNASUR. We are all Latin
Americans, we possess an
enormous potential and our
wealth can mean the salvation of
the entire planet. We must be
prepared to assume our
sovereignty over these resources
and to be masters of our own
destiny and, in this way, to
effectively accomplish the end
purpose of all our efforts,
which is the happiness of our
nations, of our citizens, of
everyone.
|